Search for: "R.C. Fischer "
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
’” Justice Fischer, majority opinion “Defamation is an injury or loss to reputation, not to person, and therefore the caps on damages in R.C. 2315.18 do not apply when a person is defamed. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” Justice Fischer, Majority Opinion “I fail to see how the administrative remedies in R.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
Justice Fischer wrote a dissent, joined by Justices DeWine and Kennedy. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
Justice Fischer concurred, with a separate opinion, as did Justice Donnelly. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, DeWine, and O’Donnell* *Then-Justice O’Donnell would only accept on proposition of Law No.1 No: Justice Kennedy and DeGenaro Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 124.27(B) (The Probation Statute) (Appointments in classified civil service shall be for a probationary period. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
R.C. 317.08(A)(19) expressly includes mortgages. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am
Justice Fischer’s Dissent Justice Fischer thinks a deposition does fall within the meaning of “proceeding” as that term is used in R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
” Justice Fischer, opinion of the Court On February 19, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Fischer, Donnelly, and Stewart voted for dismissal. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am
In an opinion written by Justice French, joined by Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Fischer and Donnelly, the court held that Ohio’s construction statute of repose, R.C. 2305.131, applies to both contract and tort actions as long as such actions otherwise meet the requirements of the statute. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
Justice Fischer concurred in the judgment and paragraphs 1 through 23 of the majority opinion. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
Since Justice Fischer was on the appellate panel in this case, he has recused himself, and Judge Thomas Wright of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals will be sitting in his stead. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:47 am
Defamation is certainly within the scope of R.C. 2315.18. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am
Justice Fischer dissented, and Justice DeWine dissented with an opinion. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:59 am
Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Fischer, Donnelly, Stewart, and Judge Hensal, subbing for Justice DeWine, voted to dismiss. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Justice Fischer’s Position Justice Fischer agrees the record in the case shows the case isn’t moot. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:39 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and DeWine No: Justices Fischer and DeGenaro Key Precedent R.C. 2919.21(A) (Criminalizing nonsupport of dependents) R.C. 3107.07(A) (Adoption Consent Statute) (Consent to adoption is not required when parent fails without justifiable cause to provide maintenance and support for the minor child for at least one year, as required by law or judicial decree.) [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:48 am
No: Justice Fischer and former Justice O’Donnell. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
AirNet is not proceeding under R.C. 2319.27 but under R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
